The Five Principles
Islam’s Trilogy of three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the Trilogy is sorted, categorized, arranged, rewritten and analyzed, it becomes apparent that five principles are the foundation of Islam.
All of Islam is based upon the Trilogy—Koran, Sira (Mohammed’s biography) and Hadith (his Traditions).Most of the Islamic doctrine is political, not religious. Islam is a political ideology.
Islam divides the world into Muslims and unbelievers, kafirs.
Political Islam always has two different ways to treat kafirs—dualistic ethics. Kafirs can be abused in the worst ways or they can be treated like a good neighbor.
Kafirs must submit to Islam in all politics and public life. Every aspect of kafir civilization must submit to political Islam.
These Five Principles can be put in five words—Trilogy, politics, kafirs, dualism and submission. These five words bring clarity and ease of learning about political Islam.
Up until now Islam has been hard to understand because it seemed complex and contradictory and did not make sense. But, once you see how the Five Principles work, everything falls into place. Complexity becomes simplicity. Chaos becomes order.
All CSPI books are based on these Five Principles.
1. trilogy
The Trilogy contains three books—
The Koran is what Mohammed said that the angel Gabriel said that Allah said. But the Koran does not contain enough guidance for one to be a Muslim. The Koran repeatedly says that all of the world should imitate Mohammed in every way. Mohammed’s words and deeds are called the Sunna. The Sunna is found in two different texts—the Sira and Hadith.
The first source of the Sunna is the Sira which is Mohammed’s biography. The most authoritative version is by Ibn Ishaq.
The other source of the Sunna is the Hadith, the Traditions of Mohammed. There are several versions of Hadith, but the most commonly used is by Bukhari.So the Trilogy is the Koran, Sira and Hadith.
2. political islam
Political Islam is the doctrine that relates to the unbeliever, the kafir. Islam’s relationship to the kafir cannot be religious since a Muslim is strictly forbidden to have any religious interaction with them The religion of Islam is what is required for a Muslim to avoid Hell and enter Paradise.
The Trilogy not only advocates a religious superiority over the kafir—the kafirs go to Hell whereas Muslims go to Paradise—but also its doctrine demands that Muslims dominate the kafir in all politics and culture. This domination is political, not religious.
As mentioned earlier, the Koran has 61% of its text devoted to the kafir. The Sira (Mohammed’s biography) has about 75% of its text devoted to the kafir and jihad.
Islam’s success comes primarily from its politics. In thirteen years as a spiritual leader, Mohammed converted 150 people to his religion. When he became a political leader and warrior, Islam exploded in growth, and Mohammed became king of Arabia in ten years.
Islam has a complete doctrine of how to treat the kafir that is found in the Trilogy.
3. kafirs
Non-believers are so important that they have several names. Christians and Jews are called People of the Book or infidels. Other religious names for non-Muslims are atheist, polytheist, and pagan. But the Koran uses one word that includes all of the religious names. That name is kafir, an Arabic word.
Kafir is usually translated as unbeliever, but that translation is wrong. Unbeliever is a neutral word. The Koran is very clear about the kafir. Indeed, the Koran defines the kafir by how it speaks of them. Kafirs are the lowest and worst form of life. Kafirs can be robbed, murdered, tortured, enslaved, crucified and more. Later in this chapter, more of the Koran’s doctrine of the kafir is given in some detail. But the key point is that a kafir is not only a non-Muslim, but also a person who falls under a different moral code from the Muslim.
The Koran is devoted to the division between those who believe Mohammed, Muslims, and those who do not, kafirs. This grand division of the Koran means that there are two points of view of the Koran—the view of the Muslim and the view of the kafir.
4. dualism
The third principle is duality, and is unique to Islam. As an example, here is a verse from the Koran:
109:2 I do not worship what you worship, and you do not worship what I worship. I will never worship what you worship, and you will never worship what I worship. You to your religion, me to my religion.
This sounds very tolerant, but this verse was written later:
9:5 When the sacred months are passed, kill the kafirs wherever you find them. Take them as captives, besiege them, and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush. If they submit to Islam, observe prayer, and pay the poor tax, then let them go their way. Allah is gracious and merciful.
Now we have absolute intolerance. This contradiction is normal for the Koran and is even addressed in the Koran. The solution to contradiction is called abrogation where the later verse is better than the earlier verse.
The logic here is very important. Since Allah is perfect and the Koran is the exact words of Allah, then both contradictory verses are true, but the later verse is better or stronger. This leads to dualistic logic where two contradictory facts can both be true.
5. submission
Islam means submission and Muslim means one who has submitted. It is clearly stated in the Trilogy that all kafirs and their civilizations must be annihilated. Mohammed’s success depended on violence to persuade kafirs that he was the prophet of Allah.
Submission is political, as well as religious. Islam demands that kafirs submit in every aspect of public life. Every part of kafir culture is an offense to Allah.
Friday, December 10, 2010
Thursday, November 18, 2010
One Wrong Move
I have few concerns genuinely with the whole campaign of Bharat Swabhimaan even though I am a fond follower of Swami RamDevji Maharaj, whom we fondly call Babaji. The intention with which Babaji has started this revolution is undoubted. But entering politics by floating a new party against two major national parties is foolishness. I may be wrong, but I dont want to be proved right. As this would only bring the downfall of our beloved Babaji and waste of lots of donated money (forget about geting back the money from Swiss bank).
Bharat Swabhimaan talks the same language, same intentions, same goals as VHP, RSS and their sister organizations do. But to be politically right, Babaji never utters the word HINDU. I am a proud Hindu and say it everywhere, anywhere, anytime. What Babaji talks and intends to make will ultimately be called a "Hindu Rashtra". Why cant Babaji and Bharat Swabhimaan Andolan act as catalyst to promote BJP openly? We have enough parties in our country. Corrupt people are everywhere, even in BJP. We can take them off through a good Swabhiman Andolan. If Babaji floats a new party say XYZ, it is only going to divide the most precious Hindu votes. Take the example of MNS, Shiva Sena and BJP in MH during the lok sabha election. MNS got maximum votes which used to be Shivsena's votes, BJP faced bad vote percentage. Who won ? Congress!! Actually in the context of this, if only BJP were to be contesting elections without MNS and Shivsena, BJP would have got atleast 25 seats more alone in MH. Which means forming a Govt at the centre. Which inturn means development!! Learning from this lesson which has burnt fingers badly, do u think another party is needed which will split Hindu votes again? Anyway Muslims and Christians are never going to vote for either Babaji, BJP, MNS etc. Small neglible number of such good ppl who do vote, will never be significant. Babaji's party will only mean another term for Anti- National, Dynasty ruled Congress. !!
Coming to the people who will be representing Babaji's party in elections will have to be carefully chosen. History speaks for itself of how people change and become corrupt when they enter politics. More and more power to those people who were never known to be in the public domain or social work will become corrupt easily. Politics of today demands everyone to be a crook, even if you dont wish to be. Look at Yedyurappa's son's landscams!! Whether the CM is involved or not, his close associates and relatives will be. For no mistake of his, the Karnataka CM is given enough nightmares. Do you think the rest of political arena will leave any chances of maligning our beloved Babaji? He may not escape even if there is single but a big scandal from his own associates! Remember, he himself is amongst last big fishes who are still clean. If the Italian born can malign the Kanchi Shankaracharyaji falsely and get him arrested on the day of Deepawali , it can happen to our Babaji too. Babaji is playing his future in the hands of Congress. If the Bharat Swabhimaan Andolan fails to get enough support, it means it looses elections. It also means people who have hugely donated their hard earned and black money will only question the intention on Babaji. Protests, disappointments, anger, agony, pain will all burst like a angry volcano and burn the big dream into ashes. Babaji who is known as the yogic Hero of our times will be reduced to a political Zero. Such a failure can never bring back the fan following in future. Babaji has to recall what He has promised himself and the country, a country free of diseases, starvation, agony, pain and self pity.
One wrong move can potentially lock all doors of the Patanajali Yog Peeth! One wrong move can convert Babaji's followers into his enemies. One wrong move could never get back Babaji's image world over. One wrong move can shatter Babaji's empire and also a country future. A dream of confident, patriotic, scientific, highly educated country will be shattered once again.
Bharat Swabhimaan talks the same language, same intentions, same goals as VHP, RSS and their sister organizations do. But to be politically right, Babaji never utters the word HINDU. I am a proud Hindu and say it everywhere, anywhere, anytime. What Babaji talks and intends to make will ultimately be called a "Hindu Rashtra". Why cant Babaji and Bharat Swabhimaan Andolan act as catalyst to promote BJP openly? We have enough parties in our country. Corrupt people are everywhere, even in BJP. We can take them off through a good Swabhiman Andolan. If Babaji floats a new party say XYZ, it is only going to divide the most precious Hindu votes. Take the example of MNS, Shiva Sena and BJP in MH during the lok sabha election. MNS got maximum votes which used to be Shivsena's votes, BJP faced bad vote percentage. Who won ? Congress!! Actually in the context of this, if only BJP were to be contesting elections without MNS and Shivsena, BJP would have got atleast 25 seats more alone in MH. Which means forming a Govt at the centre. Which inturn means development!! Learning from this lesson which has burnt fingers badly, do u think another party is needed which will split Hindu votes again? Anyway Muslims and Christians are never going to vote for either Babaji, BJP, MNS etc. Small neglible number of such good ppl who do vote, will never be significant. Babaji's party will only mean another term for Anti- National, Dynasty ruled Congress. !!
Coming to the people who will be representing Babaji's party in elections will have to be carefully chosen. History speaks for itself of how people change and become corrupt when they enter politics. More and more power to those people who were never known to be in the public domain or social work will become corrupt easily. Politics of today demands everyone to be a crook, even if you dont wish to be. Look at Yedyurappa's son's landscams!! Whether the CM is involved or not, his close associates and relatives will be. For no mistake of his, the Karnataka CM is given enough nightmares. Do you think the rest of political arena will leave any chances of maligning our beloved Babaji? He may not escape even if there is single but a big scandal from his own associates! Remember, he himself is amongst last big fishes who are still clean. If the Italian born can malign the Kanchi Shankaracharyaji falsely and get him arrested on the day of Deepawali , it can happen to our Babaji too. Babaji is playing his future in the hands of Congress. If the Bharat Swabhimaan Andolan fails to get enough support, it means it looses elections. It also means people who have hugely donated their hard earned and black money will only question the intention on Babaji. Protests, disappointments, anger, agony, pain will all burst like a angry volcano and burn the big dream into ashes. Babaji who is known as the yogic Hero of our times will be reduced to a political Zero. Such a failure can never bring back the fan following in future. Babaji has to recall what He has promised himself and the country, a country free of diseases, starvation, agony, pain and self pity.
One wrong move can potentially lock all doors of the Patanajali Yog Peeth! One wrong move can convert Babaji's followers into his enemies. One wrong move could never get back Babaji's image world over. One wrong move can shatter Babaji's empire and also a country future. A dream of confident, patriotic, scientific, highly educated country will be shattered once again.
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Can a HINDU ever become or called a Terrorist?
The Hindu Rate Of Wrath
This article is written not by me but by Francois Gautier. I loved this article and would like to share it with you all. A brief introduction of the author followed by the actual subject.
By Francois Gautier
Is there such a thing as 'Hindu terrorism', as the arrest of Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur for the Malegaon blasts may tend to prove? Well, I guess I was asked to write this column because I am one of that rare breed of foreign correspondents—a lover of Hindus! A born Frenchman, Catholic-educated and non-Hindu, I do hope I'll be given some credit for my opinions, which are not the product of my parents' ideas, my education or my atavism, but garnered from 25 years of reporting in South Asia (for Le Journal de Geneve and Le Figaro).
In the early 1980s, when I started freelancing in south India, doing photo features on Kalaripayattu, the Ayyappa festival, or the Ayyanars, I slowly realised that the genius of this country lies in its Hindu ethos, in the true spirituality behind Hinduism. The average Hindu you meet in a million villages possesses this simple, innate spirituality and accepts your diversity, whether you are Christian or Muslim, Jain or Arab, French or Chinese. It is this Hinduness that makes the Indian Christian different from, say, a French Christian, or the Indian Muslim unlike a Saudi Muslim. I also learnt that Hindus not only believed that the divine could manifest itself at different times, under different names, using different scriptures(not to mention the wonderful avatar concept, the perfect answer to 21st century religious strife) but that they had also given refuge to persecuted minorities from across the world—Syrian Christians, Parsis, Jews, Armenians, and today, Tibetans.
In 3,500 years of existence, Hindus have never militarily invaded another country, never tried to impose their religion on others by force or induced conversions. You cannot find anybody less fundamentalist than a Hindu in the world and it saddens me when I see the Indian and western press equating terrorist groups like SIMI, which blow up innocent civilians, with ordinary, angry Hindus who burn churches without killing anybody. We know also that most of these communal incidents often involve persons from the same groups—often Dalits and tribals—some of who have converted to Christianity and others not. However reprehensible the destruction of Babri Masjid, no Muslim was killed in the process; compare this to the 'vengeance' bombings of 1993 in Bombay, which wiped out hundreds of innocents, mostly Hindus. Yet the Babri Masjid destruction is often described by journalists as the more horrible act of the two. We also remember how Sharad Pawar, when he was Chief minister of Maharashtra in 1993, lied about a bomb that was supposed to have gone off in a Muslim locality of Bombay.
I have never been politically correct, but have always written what I have discovered while reporting. Let me then be straightforward about this so-called Hindu terror. Hindus, since the first Arab invasions, have been at the receiving end of terrorism, whether it was by Timur, who killed 1,00,000 Hindus in a single day in 1399, or by the Portuguese Inquisition which crucified Brahmins in Goa. Today, Hindus are still being targeted: there were one million Hindus in the Kashmir valley in 1900; only a few hundred remain, the rest having fled in terror. Blasts after blasts have killed hundreds of innocent Hindus all over India in the last four years. Hindus, the overwhelming majority community of this country, are being made fun of, are despised, are deprived of the most basic facilities for one of their most sacred pilgrimages in Amarnath while their government heavily sponsors the Haj. They see their brothers and sisters converted to Christianity through inducements and financial traps, see a harmless 84-year-old swami and a sadhvi brutally murdered. Their gods are blasphemed. So sometimes, enough is enough.
At some point, after years or even centuries of submitting like sheep to slaughter, Hindus—whom the Mahatma once gently called cowards—erupt in uncontrolled fury. And it hurts badly. It happened in Gujarat. It happened in Jammu, then in Kandhamal, Mangalore, and Malegaon. It may happen again elsewhere. What should be understood is that this is a spontaneous revolution on the ground, by ordinary Hindus, without any planning from the political leadership. Therefore, the BJP, instead of acting embarrassed, should not disown those who choose other means to let their anguished voices be heard.
There are about a billion Hindus, one in every six persons on this planet.
They form one of the most successful, law-abiding and integrated communities in the world today.
Can you call them terrorists?
(The writer is the editor-in-chief of the Paris-based La Revue de l'Inde)
This article is written not by me but by Francois Gautier. I loved this article and would like to share it with you all. A brief introduction of the author followed by the actual subject.
By Francois Gautier
Is there such a thing as 'Hindu terrorism', as the arrest of Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur for the Malegaon blasts may tend to prove? Well, I guess I was asked to write this column because I am one of that rare breed of foreign correspondents—a lover of Hindus! A born Frenchman, Catholic-educated and non-Hindu, I do hope I'll be given some credit for my opinions, which are not the product of my parents' ideas, my education or my atavism, but garnered from 25 years of reporting in South Asia (for Le Journal de Geneve and Le Figaro).
In the early 1980s, when I started freelancing in south India, doing photo features on Kalaripayattu, the Ayyappa festival, or the Ayyanars, I slowly realised that the genius of this country lies in its Hindu ethos, in the true spirituality behind Hinduism. The average Hindu you meet in a million villages possesses this simple, innate spirituality and accepts your diversity, whether you are Christian or Muslim, Jain or Arab, French or Chinese. It is this Hinduness that makes the Indian Christian different from, say, a French Christian, or the Indian Muslim unlike a Saudi Muslim. I also learnt that Hindus not only believed that the divine could manifest itself at different times, under different names, using different scriptures(not to mention the wonderful avatar concept, the perfect answer to 21st century religious strife) but that they had also given refuge to persecuted minorities from across the world—Syrian Christians, Parsis, Jews, Armenians, and today, Tibetans.
In 3,500 years of existence, Hindus have never militarily invaded another country, never tried to impose their religion on others by force or induced conversions. You cannot find anybody less fundamentalist than a Hindu in the world and it saddens me when I see the Indian and western press equating terrorist groups like SIMI, which blow up innocent civilians, with ordinary, angry Hindus who burn churches without killing anybody. We know also that most of these communal incidents often involve persons from the same groups—often Dalits and tribals—some of who have converted to Christianity and others not. However reprehensible the destruction of Babri Masjid, no Muslim was killed in the process; compare this to the 'vengeance' bombings of 1993 in Bombay, which wiped out hundreds of innocents, mostly Hindus. Yet the Babri Masjid destruction is often described by journalists as the more horrible act of the two. We also remember how Sharad Pawar, when he was Chief minister of Maharashtra in 1993, lied about a bomb that was supposed to have gone off in a Muslim locality of Bombay.
I have never been politically correct, but have always written what I have discovered while reporting. Let me then be straightforward about this so-called Hindu terror. Hindus, since the first Arab invasions, have been at the receiving end of terrorism, whether it was by Timur, who killed 1,00,000 Hindus in a single day in 1399, or by the Portuguese Inquisition which crucified Brahmins in Goa. Today, Hindus are still being targeted: there were one million Hindus in the Kashmir valley in 1900; only a few hundred remain, the rest having fled in terror. Blasts after blasts have killed hundreds of innocent Hindus all over India in the last four years. Hindus, the overwhelming majority community of this country, are being made fun of, are despised, are deprived of the most basic facilities for one of their most sacred pilgrimages in Amarnath while their government heavily sponsors the Haj. They see their brothers and sisters converted to Christianity through inducements and financial traps, see a harmless 84-year-old swami and a sadhvi brutally murdered. Their gods are blasphemed. So sometimes, enough is enough.
At some point, after years or even centuries of submitting like sheep to slaughter, Hindus—whom the Mahatma once gently called cowards—erupt in uncontrolled fury. And it hurts badly. It happened in Gujarat. It happened in Jammu, then in Kandhamal, Mangalore, and Malegaon. It may happen again elsewhere. What should be understood is that this is a spontaneous revolution on the ground, by ordinary Hindus, without any planning from the political leadership. Therefore, the BJP, instead of acting embarrassed, should not disown those who choose other means to let their anguished voices be heard.
There are about a billion Hindus, one in every six persons on this planet.
They form one of the most successful, law-abiding and integrated communities in the world today.
Can you call them terrorists?
(The writer is the editor-in-chief of the Paris-based La Revue de l'Inde)
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Paneer aur Dal ki Tikki
Ingredients:
1. Paneer (cottage cheese) 200 gm (Grated or finely chopped)
2. Chana dal 200 gm (Soaked for 3-4 hrs)
3. Ginger 1 About an inch in size
4. Green chillies 2 - 4 (Fine chopped)
5. Turmeric powder 1/4 spoon
6. Garlic 3-4 cloves
7. Curd 1 cup (Unsweetened and unsalted)
8. Onion 1 cup (Finely Chopped)
9. Garam Masala Powder 1 Tbsp
10. Chat Masala 1 Tbsp
11. Oil 1 cup ( for shallow frying)
12. Coriander Leaves handful (Finely chopped)
13. Salt to taste
14. Lemon Half (Lemon Juice)
Method:
1. Grind ingredients 2 to 6 into a semi solid paste. Do not grind into fine paste. Make sure its a bit grainy. Its must be thick enough and grainy to make patties. Look at the pic provided below.
2. Add Paneer + Curd + Onion + Garam masala ( you can avoid Chat masala if u dont prefer with Garam Masala) + Salt + Coriander leaves into the mixture made in Step 1. Mix uniformly.
3. Make small Tikkis (patties). Cookie size.
4. Shallow fry in a non sticky pan till golden brown on both the sides. Check my pics below.
Server with a dash of lemon juice on them. Goes well with Tomato Ketchup and Pudina (Mint) Chutni. This serves 4 people for a nice evening snack.
Enjoy :) !!
1. Paneer (cottage cheese) 200 gm (Grated or finely chopped)
2. Chana dal 200 gm (Soaked for 3-4 hrs)
3. Ginger 1 About an inch in size
4. Green chillies 2 - 4 (Fine chopped)
5. Turmeric powder 1/4 spoon
6. Garlic 3-4 cloves
7. Curd 1 cup (Unsweetened and unsalted)
8. Onion 1 cup (Finely Chopped)
9. Garam Masala Powder 1 Tbsp
10. Chat Masala 1 Tbsp
11. Oil 1 cup ( for shallow frying)
12. Coriander Leaves handful (Finely chopped)
13. Salt to taste
14. Lemon Half (Lemon Juice)
Method:
1. Grind ingredients 2 to 6 into a semi solid paste. Do not grind into fine paste. Make sure its a bit grainy. Its must be thick enough and grainy to make patties. Look at the pic provided below.
2. Add Paneer + Curd + Onion + Garam masala ( you can avoid Chat masala if u dont prefer with Garam Masala) + Salt + Coriander leaves into the mixture made in Step 1. Mix uniformly.
3. Make small Tikkis (patties). Cookie size.
4. Shallow fry in a non sticky pan till golden brown on both the sides. Check my pics below.
Server with a dash of lemon juice on them. Goes well with Tomato Ketchup and Pudina (Mint) Chutni. This serves 4 people for a nice evening snack.
Enjoy :) !!
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Cauliflower and Carrot Subji
Ingredients:
1. Cauliflower: Cut into flowerets 200 gm,
2. Carrots diced: 150 gm
3. Potato diced: Small
4. Coriander powder: 1/2 Tsp
5. Coriander leaves: Handful
6. Turmeric powder: 1/2 Tsp
7. Salt: To taste
8. Jeera: 1 Tsp
9. Ginger: About a inch, grated.
10. Red chili Powder 1/2 Tsp
10. Mustard oil 3-4 Tbsp
Method:
--> Heat oil on high flame so that the strong smell of the mustard oil goes out.
--> Lower the flame and add Jeera. Fry until it crackles.
--> Add Potatoes and fry till light golden brown.
--> Add coriander powder, turmeric powder, ginger, red chili powder. Fry for about a 30 sec to 1 min.
--> Add cauliflower and carrots.
--> Add salt and give a bit of water ( 1/4 cup if required). Close the pan with a lid till all the veggies are cooked properly.
--> Stir occasionally.
--> Once all the veggies are cooked, add coriander leaves and saute.
Serve Hot and Enjoy !!
Ingredients:
1. Cauliflower: Cut into flowerets 200 gm,
2. Carrots diced: 150 gm
3. Potato diced: Small
4. Coriander powder: 1/2 Tsp
5. Coriander leaves: Handful
6. Turmeric powder: 1/2 Tsp
7. Salt: To taste
8. Jeera: 1 Tsp
9. Ginger: About a inch, grated.
10. Red chili Powder 1/2 Tsp
10. Mustard oil 3-4 Tbsp
Method:
--> Heat oil on high flame so that the strong smell of the mustard oil goes out.
--> Lower the flame and add Jeera. Fry until it crackles.
--> Add Potatoes and fry till light golden brown.
--> Add coriander powder, turmeric powder, ginger, red chili powder. Fry for about a 30 sec to 1 min.
--> Add cauliflower and carrots.
--> Add salt and give a bit of water ( 1/4 cup if required). Close the pan with a lid till all the veggies are cooked properly.
--> Stir occasionally.
--> Once all the veggies are cooked, add coriander leaves and saute.
Serve Hot and Enjoy !!
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Killing as usual !!
Killing as usual !!
I was reading an article in a news daily which estimates 6 million cows from India every year are illegally taken away to Bangladeshi slaugther houses. Mind you, this is only an estimate. This figure is for illegally abducted cows across border. The meat is more than 60% of the total meat produced and consumed in entire Bangladesh. What caused the Bangladeshi to consume so much beef? Answer is simple. 80% of the population in B'Desh is muslim. Today there are around 280 million cows in India that produce 100 million tones of Milk every year. In 1947 the cattle population was about 45 crores. Within 60+ years we have reduced its population by 40%, which is very sharp.
Majority of the cattle that is slaughtered is for beef. It is utterly false that the cattle is killed for leather industry. The leather industry has been 'growing' in India because muslim/christian population (beef eaters) is increasing. 95% of the Merchants in leather industry are muslims and only a handful of Hindus are into this business. More the eaters, more the leather is produced and not other way round. India is second largest exporter of leather goods in the world now!
How to stop cattle killing:
1. Implement the anti-cow slaugther bill strictly.
2. Stop issuing new licenses to leather manufactures.
3. Raid muslim areas for illegal slaugther houses, punish them severely.
4. Promote Vegetarnism.
5. Promote cow based industry like dairy.
6. Stop cow smuggling across border and declare it anti-national. Make a separate law for anti-cow smuggling.
7. Educate everyone the importance cow in Hindu/Indian society.
8. Crack down on the existing leather product manufacturers for acquired illegal licenses.
9. Promote Indian/environment friendly farming techniques.
I was reading an article in a news daily which estimates 6 million cows from India every year are illegally taken away to Bangladeshi slaugther houses. Mind you, this is only an estimate. This figure is for illegally abducted cows across border. The meat is more than 60% of the total meat produced and consumed in entire Bangladesh. What caused the Bangladeshi to consume so much beef? Answer is simple. 80% of the population in B'Desh is muslim. Today there are around 280 million cows in India that produce 100 million tones of Milk every year. In 1947 the cattle population was about 45 crores. Within 60+ years we have reduced its population by 40%, which is very sharp.
Majority of the cattle that is slaughtered is for beef. It is utterly false that the cattle is killed for leather industry. The leather industry has been 'growing' in India because muslim/christian population (beef eaters) is increasing. 95% of the Merchants in leather industry are muslims and only a handful of Hindus are into this business. More the eaters, more the leather is produced and not other way round. India is second largest exporter of leather goods in the world now!
How to stop cattle killing:
1. Implement the anti-cow slaugther bill strictly.
2. Stop issuing new licenses to leather manufactures.
3. Raid muslim areas for illegal slaugther houses, punish them severely.
4. Promote Vegetarnism.
5. Promote cow based industry like dairy.
6. Stop cow smuggling across border and declare it anti-national. Make a separate law for anti-cow smuggling.
7. Educate everyone the importance cow in Hindu/Indian society.
8. Crack down on the existing leather product manufacturers for acquired illegal licenses.
9. Promote Indian/environment friendly farming techniques.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Be hard on Naxals.
Taking this article from my favorite weekly mag:
WHEN will all these Maoist killings stop? Is there no end to their brutality? Of course, the blame lies entirely on the far-Left radical communists supportive of Maoist political sentiment and ideology. Mao, like Stalin, was not a simple ideologist. He was a murderer, responsible for the deaths of millions of his countrymen in cold blood. He was no friend of the poor. Nor are today’s Maoists in India, the so-called Naxalites. They are professional murderers in the name of seeking justice for the tribals. They are believers in armed liberation whatever that means. Home Minister P Chidamabram says that is it not his intention to kill Naxalites because "they are our own people". Nonsense. The Naxals don’t treat innocent fellow citizens as "our people". The killing of innocent people has been going on since 1996 when 156 were murdered.
According to Home Ministry records, in the last twenty years the Naxalites have killed more than 6,000 people and expressed no regrets. The most recent killings at Sildah in West Bengal resulting in 21 jawans being charred to death is true to Maoist character. They understand only one language: State force. West Bengal is a pathetic case. Under the guidance of the CPM and of its face mask the late Jyoti Basu, police were inveigled into Marxism and the CPM ideology in the 1970s. In the circumstances they have shown a marked reluctance to fight Naxalites. The policemen in Sildah were totally unprepared for the Naxal onslaught. Even their rifles were not in working order. They could not shoot more than one bullet. It is not their fault. The fault lies squarely with the Communist Buddhadev Government which, by now, has destroyed police commitment to their profession.
To destroy Naxalism, one must first totally eliminate communism from our political system, making it illegal. The State must show no mercy to professional killers who, according to India’s Intelligency Agency, the Research & Analysis Wing (RAW) exercise control over 92,000 square kms in 220 districts spread in twenty states. There apparently are 20,000 Naxalite armed cadres actively engaged in carrying out a "war", aided and abetted by some 50,000 civil caders working in various mass organisations under spurious names. And supporting these gangsters are hundreds of "intellectuals" who should know better.
The worst enemies of India are not the tribesmen in whose name Naxalies kill and loot, but our misled "intellectuals" whose icon is Charu Mazumdar who divided people along class lines, naming police, landlords and corrupt politicians as "class enemies" to be eliminated. The viciousness of the Naxalites extends beyond the so-called "class enemies". According to United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), Maoists blew up nearly 300 schools in India between 2006 and 2009. This was followed by Naxalites recruiting children to do the dirty work. The trouble is that, apart from West Bengal where police have literally ceased to be police, in other States police/population ratio is pathetic.
Consider these facts: New Delhi has 3953 police officers to every square mile of its territory, while Chhattisgarh has just 22, Jharkhand 50 and Bihar 59. The United Nations has recommended that 220 police officers be available for every 10,000 population. India has an average of just 125. In a major study on police Reform in India, JY Umranikar IPS has noted that there are only 518 rural police stations in Maharashtra as against 3,035 recommended by the National Police Commission. What is worse is the fact pointed out by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs in its 88th report that "today we have a police force which is highly politicized and politically polarized (which) has become a pawn in the hands of its masters". In return, the Report said, "the policemen get political patronage, which has become necessary for their survival". But things apparently are changing.
According to Express News Service (February 14), five Border Security Force (BSF) battalions - about 5,000 personnel will be moving into Malkangiri District and adjoining areas in Orissa to counter Naxals who are desperately seeking a safe haven following operations in Chhattisgarh. The inter-State border will be sealed with check points, just as it is being done on the Maharashtra side. In Maharashtra’s Gadchiroli district- the worst Maoist-affected in the state - the government has apparently agreed to recruit some 3,000 tribes people into the police force to be trained for anti-Naxal operations. Home Secretary GK Pillai is quoted as saying that "once the full employment of forces come, we should be able to clear Gadchiroli of all Naxal elements within a year".
It is not clear what kind of training the tribes people will get, considering most of the Naxalites are tribes people themselves. How prepared the Security Establishment is to tackle Naxalite terror was last exposed on March 15, 2007 when Naxalites attacked and killed 55 Security Personnel in Chhattisgarh. According to a report, "cowardice, desertion by Security Personnel, too much dependence on locally-recruited Special Police Officers (SPOs), delayed rescue operations, lack of proper training were identified as the key reasons for the killings by Naxalites. In the circumstances hiring tribals to fight tribals cannot be a recommended suggestion. One suggestion put forward to control the Naxalites is to "saturate" tribal areas with development plans. A better idea would be to create an entirely tribal administrative service (TAS) with powers to locate areas needing development and authority to use appropriate funds without having to go through administrative hassles. But first and foremost, the government must dislodge the so-called "instigating the tribals to armed revolt. The enemy of the country is not the poor uneducated tribal but the well-educated urban intellectual who has sold his soul to the long-exposed inhuman ideology of western societies - a mocking of which was made in China by a barbarian called Mao-Tse-Tung. We don’t have to be soft towards such characters who, behind the veneer of toplevel education, are traitors seeking to destroy the essential unity of the country and deserve no pity. Of late Mr Chidambram seems to have realised it. As he told the New Delhi Indian Women’s Press Crops recently, there can be no "half-way approach" towards the CPI (Maoists). Those who take up the sword must perish by the sword.
WHEN will all these Maoist killings stop? Is there no end to their brutality? Of course, the blame lies entirely on the far-Left radical communists supportive of Maoist political sentiment and ideology. Mao, like Stalin, was not a simple ideologist. He was a murderer, responsible for the deaths of millions of his countrymen in cold blood. He was no friend of the poor. Nor are today’s Maoists in India, the so-called Naxalites. They are professional murderers in the name of seeking justice for the tribals. They are believers in armed liberation whatever that means. Home Minister P Chidamabram says that is it not his intention to kill Naxalites because "they are our own people". Nonsense. The Naxals don’t treat innocent fellow citizens as "our people". The killing of innocent people has been going on since 1996 when 156 were murdered.
According to Home Ministry records, in the last twenty years the Naxalites have killed more than 6,000 people and expressed no regrets. The most recent killings at Sildah in West Bengal resulting in 21 jawans being charred to death is true to Maoist character. They understand only one language: State force. West Bengal is a pathetic case. Under the guidance of the CPM and of its face mask the late Jyoti Basu, police were inveigled into Marxism and the CPM ideology in the 1970s. In the circumstances they have shown a marked reluctance to fight Naxalites. The policemen in Sildah were totally unprepared for the Naxal onslaught. Even their rifles were not in working order. They could not shoot more than one bullet. It is not their fault. The fault lies squarely with the Communist Buddhadev Government which, by now, has destroyed police commitment to their profession.
To destroy Naxalism, one must first totally eliminate communism from our political system, making it illegal. The State must show no mercy to professional killers who, according to India’s Intelligency Agency, the Research & Analysis Wing (RAW) exercise control over 92,000 square kms in 220 districts spread in twenty states. There apparently are 20,000 Naxalite armed cadres actively engaged in carrying out a "war", aided and abetted by some 50,000 civil caders working in various mass organisations under spurious names. And supporting these gangsters are hundreds of "intellectuals" who should know better.
The worst enemies of India are not the tribesmen in whose name Naxalies kill and loot, but our misled "intellectuals" whose icon is Charu Mazumdar who divided people along class lines, naming police, landlords and corrupt politicians as "class enemies" to be eliminated. The viciousness of the Naxalites extends beyond the so-called "class enemies". According to United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), Maoists blew up nearly 300 schools in India between 2006 and 2009. This was followed by Naxalites recruiting children to do the dirty work. The trouble is that, apart from West Bengal where police have literally ceased to be police, in other States police/population ratio is pathetic.
Consider these facts: New Delhi has 3953 police officers to every square mile of its territory, while Chhattisgarh has just 22, Jharkhand 50 and Bihar 59. The United Nations has recommended that 220 police officers be available for every 10,000 population. India has an average of just 125. In a major study on police Reform in India, JY Umranikar IPS has noted that there are only 518 rural police stations in Maharashtra as against 3,035 recommended by the National Police Commission. What is worse is the fact pointed out by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs in its 88th report that "today we have a police force which is highly politicized and politically polarized (which) has become a pawn in the hands of its masters". In return, the Report said, "the policemen get political patronage, which has become necessary for their survival". But things apparently are changing.
According to Express News Service (February 14), five Border Security Force (BSF) battalions - about 5,000 personnel will be moving into Malkangiri District and adjoining areas in Orissa to counter Naxals who are desperately seeking a safe haven following operations in Chhattisgarh. The inter-State border will be sealed with check points, just as it is being done on the Maharashtra side. In Maharashtra’s Gadchiroli district- the worst Maoist-affected in the state - the government has apparently agreed to recruit some 3,000 tribes people into the police force to be trained for anti-Naxal operations. Home Secretary GK Pillai is quoted as saying that "once the full employment of forces come, we should be able to clear Gadchiroli of all Naxal elements within a year".
It is not clear what kind of training the tribes people will get, considering most of the Naxalites are tribes people themselves. How prepared the Security Establishment is to tackle Naxalite terror was last exposed on March 15, 2007 when Naxalites attacked and killed 55 Security Personnel in Chhattisgarh. According to a report, "cowardice, desertion by Security Personnel, too much dependence on locally-recruited Special Police Officers (SPOs), delayed rescue operations, lack of proper training were identified as the key reasons for the killings by Naxalites. In the circumstances hiring tribals to fight tribals cannot be a recommended suggestion. One suggestion put forward to control the Naxalites is to "saturate" tribal areas with development plans. A better idea would be to create an entirely tribal administrative service (TAS) with powers to locate areas needing development and authority to use appropriate funds without having to go through administrative hassles. But first and foremost, the government must dislodge the so-called "instigating the tribals to armed revolt. The enemy of the country is not the poor uneducated tribal but the well-educated urban intellectual who has sold his soul to the long-exposed inhuman ideology of western societies - a mocking of which was made in China by a barbarian called Mao-Tse-Tung. We don’t have to be soft towards such characters who, behind the veneer of toplevel education, are traitors seeking to destroy the essential unity of the country and deserve no pity. Of late Mr Chidambram seems to have realised it. As he told the New Delhi Indian Women’s Press Crops recently, there can be no "half-way approach" towards the CPI (Maoists). Those who take up the sword must perish by the sword.
Something to do with the BEARD :)
Hello friends.
Younis khan and Mohd. Yousuf are sacked for life because Pakistan lost all its matches against Australia. What pity !! But i found something very interesting and wanted to share with you.. BEARD magic..
This is just an observation...
1. In his come back, Waqar Younis sported a beard his career ended.
2. Mushtaq Ahmed sported a beard and his career too ended. He was not be seen.
3. Saqlain Mushtaq was doing very good , no injuries of any kind. He sported a beard and his career ended like an spot death in an road accident.
4. No batsman was as good as in form Saeed Anwar in his peak. He sported a beard and his career to went down drains.
5. Yusuf Yohana to be Mohd. Yusuf sported a beard, since then he is in trouble. Is he the next to go ?
Think think .. something to do with the BEARD :)
Younis khan and Mohd. Yousuf are sacked for life because Pakistan lost all its matches against Australia. What pity !! But i found something very interesting and wanted to share with you.. BEARD magic..
This is just an observation...
1. In his come back, Waqar Younis sported a beard his career ended.
2. Mushtaq Ahmed sported a beard and his career too ended. He was not be seen.
3. Saqlain Mushtaq was doing very good , no injuries of any kind. He sported a beard and his career ended like an spot death in an road accident.
4. No batsman was as good as in form Saeed Anwar in his peak. He sported a beard and his career to went down drains.
5. Yusuf Yohana to be Mohd. Yusuf sported a beard, since then he is in trouble. Is he the next to go ?
Think think .. something to do with the BEARD :)
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Violence is the essence of Islam
Violence spread out in parts of Karnataka protesting against an article that was published in a Kannada daily was really bad to witness. Senseless people always equally act senselessly. I have not got the opportunity to read the article that caused all of this chaos. But I am very sure, the content of this article is not against Islam or defamatory to Prophet Mohd. Why I am coming to this conclusion without reading the article is very simple. The Violence that spread around the world including parts of India protesting against the Danish Cartoons. I did not see a single reason that might be defamatory Islam or its believers then. Those were pretty simple cartoons and no abusive language too. The people against these cartoons cried foul and damaged property worth crores around the world. But when a Muslim Painter ( I call him road side painter) paints Gods of Other religion in Nude, the same people support the clown calling it freedom of art. Why cant the same logic be applied to the Danish cartoons? Why a double standard here? Because it is anti- muslim? No, the answer is simple. Hate towards other religion propogated by Islam makes them do this. Right from the days of the prophet till today we have witnessed only bloodshed, killings, Loot, Rape , desecration of worship places and the list goes long. So is it difficult to conclude that a religion that so intolerant from the days of its birth is not making a mountain of a mole? Ridiculous bastards.
The so called religion of peace ( as they try to propagate today around the world) has been the most intolerant religion in the history of this planet. Muslim scholars deny the fact and try propgating it as religion of peace. Have they ever read the history of Islam? Its is deliberate attempt to hide their true colours. From Mecca to Malayasia, and from Northern Europe to southern parts of Asia.From prophet Mohd to Bin Laden, it has only been killings of the infidels. Almost every chapter in the Quran is filled with hatred for other religions. It actually is a perfect guide and license to kill non-Muslims. Hadits, being the collection of the Chapters of Prophet's life, only teaches how to kill the non-Muslims. Muslim Scholars around the world justify the killings and the quotes supporting it that the quotes are only referring to the war against the Mushrifs of Mecca. Also, according to these scholars, a Muslim is supposed to kill non-Muslims as a last resort in self defense and not to Hate anyone just because he is a non-Muslim. A Muslim will resort to violence only in his defense to protect himself and his family's life from the non-Muslims. May I ask you Which Non-Muslims community has ever waged a war against the Muslims? None!!! It is the prophet who asked his followers to kill the infidels left, right and center, destroy anything that is non-Islamic. Rest of the world has only suffered the Islamic violence and not the other way around.
The tradition of in tolerance and killings is continued even today. Islam says "Kill all who are infidels, destroy everything that is not acceptable to Allah". Which God do u think propagates this hatred? The recent Beheading of our Sikh Brother in Pakistan is yet another example of their religious intolerance. If paying tax is haram in Islam, why jiziya ( tax on non-Muslims) is imposed on others? Why were the Bahamia Buddhas destroyed? Why US was attacked? Why India becomes the target of Islamic onslaught. Hindu is the only religion in the world which has never attacked or waged a war against any country or religion to expand its territory or to convert any non-Hindu. So why war against Hindus? This is only because the Islamic books and Hadits teach them and brain wash them to do so. Lets unitedly root them out to the last seed !
There is saying in Hinduism "When the light in the lamp is about to go off, it burns the brightest". Its high time that we understand that the Islamic world is about to go off the face of the planet, but not before causing more damage to the world. The time has come when we have to standup for our religion, for our family, for our country and extinguish the Islamic Fire. Its only then we can light a lamp of peace in front of our homes.
Bharat Mata ki Jai !!
The so called religion of peace ( as they try to propagate today around the world) has been the most intolerant religion in the history of this planet. Muslim scholars deny the fact and try propgating it as religion of peace. Have they ever read the history of Islam? Its is deliberate attempt to hide their true colours. From Mecca to Malayasia, and from Northern Europe to southern parts of Asia.From prophet Mohd to Bin Laden, it has only been killings of the infidels. Almost every chapter in the Quran is filled with hatred for other religions. It actually is a perfect guide and license to kill non-Muslims. Hadits, being the collection of the Chapters of Prophet's life, only teaches how to kill the non-Muslims. Muslim Scholars around the world justify the killings and the quotes supporting it that the quotes are only referring to the war against the Mushrifs of Mecca. Also, according to these scholars, a Muslim is supposed to kill non-Muslims as a last resort in self defense and not to Hate anyone just because he is a non-Muslim. A Muslim will resort to violence only in his defense to protect himself and his family's life from the non-Muslims. May I ask you Which Non-Muslims community has ever waged a war against the Muslims? None!!! It is the prophet who asked his followers to kill the infidels left, right and center, destroy anything that is non-Islamic. Rest of the world has only suffered the Islamic violence and not the other way around.
The tradition of in tolerance and killings is continued even today. Islam says "Kill all who are infidels, destroy everything that is not acceptable to Allah". Which God do u think propagates this hatred? The recent Beheading of our Sikh Brother in Pakistan is yet another example of their religious intolerance. If paying tax is haram in Islam, why jiziya ( tax on non-Muslims) is imposed on others? Why were the Bahamia Buddhas destroyed? Why US was attacked? Why India becomes the target of Islamic onslaught. Hindu is the only religion in the world which has never attacked or waged a war against any country or religion to expand its territory or to convert any non-Hindu. So why war against Hindus? This is only because the Islamic books and Hadits teach them and brain wash them to do so. Lets unitedly root them out to the last seed !
There is saying in Hinduism "When the light in the lamp is about to go off, it burns the brightest". Its high time that we understand that the Islamic world is about to go off the face of the planet, but not before causing more damage to the world. The time has come when we have to standup for our religion, for our family, for our country and extinguish the Islamic Fire. Its only then we can light a lamp of peace in front of our homes.
Bharat Mata ki Jai !!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)